A question...don't you think Ted Nugent would be happier if he could really satisfy a woman?

And if any of Nugent's supporters should happen to stumble across this, I said women, not "girls" (who, BTW, rule my world...I said they rule my world).

These latest foaming mad dog Nugent statements were made at a recent concert.

Brandishing two machine guns, with his stars and stripes guitar still slung over his shoulder, Nugent called Obama a "punk" and a "piece of shit" and said that he told the nominee to "suck on one of these" when in Chicago.

He went on to say that when he was in New York he told Clinton to "ride one of these into the sunset", calling her a "worthless bitch" and a "worthless whore."

One does not normally refer to U.S. Senators as "punks" and pieces of shit." Especially when, by any definition, somebody we support "100 percent" fits the bill a lot better.

But what I really like is the way he adds the word "worthless" to his namecalling involving our former First Lady.

It wouldn't be enough, obviously, for him just to call her a whore, because gosh darn it, how would people know he considers her worse than whoever is his whore du Jour that day? And I think it's safe to say "bitch" is his definitive term for persons of the opposite sex (call it a hunch).

She's a worthless bitch. She's a worthless whore.

(He also called her a "toxic cunt," about 15 years ago...which reveals no fear of women whatsoever.)

(But, again, dig that need for a qualifier. She's not just a cunt...such as he might see in any issue of Hustler. She's actually poison!)

(Why do I get the feeling he actually believes there's such a thing as a toxic cunt...and this may explain why my headline statement is so true?)